Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicole Gibbs vs Alycia Parks Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibbs vs Parks analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicole Gibbs vs Alycia Parks Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibbs 1 - 0 Parks
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibbs has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Parks has won 39.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibbs, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Parks has won 47.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibbs has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Parks has saved 46.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibbs has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Parks winning 29.27% (W/L 12/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibbs has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 219/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12). Parks has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 25/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gibbs winning 1 times and Parks being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gibbs winning 2 and Parks winning 0. The last match between Gibbs and Parks was at the W60 Honolulu, 11-07-2019, Second, Hard with Nicole Gibbs getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibbs and Parks have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gibbs winning 0 times and Parks 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibbs winning 0, and Parks 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibbs has played against opponents with an average rank of while Parks has played against players with an average rank of 134.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibbs has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Parks has won 21% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibbs has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Parks has converted 38.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
68
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
151
Rank
40
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
57% (281-213)
Career Total W/L
48% (159-175)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
16% (3-16)
$1,145,381
Career Prize Money
$670,272
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nicole Gibbs vs Alycia Parks For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gibbs VS Parks
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nicole Gibbs | Alycia Parks |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:4:0 | 1:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (31/48) | 40% (17/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (22/31) | 53% (9/17) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (12/17) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (23/43) | 29% (14/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Alycia Parks
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicole Gibbs | Alycia Parks |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 16% (3/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 19% (8/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (144/239) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 22% (2/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 108 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.82 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 155 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:35:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 142.26 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 51% (662/1295) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (412/662) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (248/633) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (42/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (446/1184) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 16% (3/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 12% (17/2) |
Nicole Gibbs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Nicole Gibbs
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Nicole Gibbs
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Nicole Gibbs
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Hailey Baptiste
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Nicole Gibbs
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Cristina Bucsa
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Nicole Gibbs
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
34 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Jasmine Paolini
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicole Gibbs
Player
Monica Niculescu
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alycia Parks Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Alycia Parks
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Alycia Parks
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
9
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Manon Leonard
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
6
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
6
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgia Pedone
Player
Alycia Parks
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
47%
(
45 of
95)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Alycia Parks
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Alycia Parks
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Alycia Parks
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Alycia Parks
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
13
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanina Wickmayer
Player
Alycia Parks
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
0
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
10
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Alycia Parks
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibbs Vs Parks Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gibbs are available here and Parks photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
